Re: [Tails-dev] Tor 0.2.5.x and Tails

This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MNick Mathewson at <-
M 
Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: intrigeri
Date:  
To: Nick Mathewson
CC: Roger Dingledine, The Tails public development discussion list, Andrea Shepard
New-Topics: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.2] feature/tor-0.2.5.x-alpha (#7907) [Was: Tor 0.2.5.x and Tails]
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Tor 0.2.5.x and Tails
Nick Mathewson wrote (17 Sep 2014 23:59:11 GMT) :
> My opinion is that Tor 0.2.5.x is better than 0.2.4.x, if it's working
> with you.

OK, thanks!

> The syscall sandboxing code is likely to interfere with managed PTs,
> for what that's worth.

Yep, I've noticed that. Hence, my current branch only enables the
sandbox if no special Tor configuration is asked for (finer
granularity would be better, but that's better than nothing).

Cheers,
--
intrigeri

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
tails-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Tails-dev] meek debian packaging brainstormingRe: [Tails-dev] Jessie!->
lists.autistici.org administrated by postmasterLurker (version 2.3)