[Hackmeeting] spam & more

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: $witch
Date:  
Subject: [Hackmeeting] spam & more
Azim wrote:

> $witch wrote:
>
>> Azim wrote:
>>
>>> pinna wrote:
>>>
>>>> e ritengo che un wiki, seppur vincolato all'uso di una password
>>>> nota pubblicamente per la modifica di poche pagine, non si discosti
>>>> di molto
>>>> dalla filosofia originaria dei wiki, che per altro credo sia stata
>>>> concepita prima del diffondersi degli spam-script che attualmente
>>>> infestano wiki, CMS, forum, etc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Concordo.
>>>
>
>     - If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
>       summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
>       enough text of the original to give a context.  This will make
>       sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
>       Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
>       postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
>       response to a message before seeing the original.  Giving context
>       helps everyone.  But do not include the entire original!

>
>> concordo un beato cazzo.
>>
>> avete pure rotto i coglioni : parlate senza aver letto.
>>
>> RFC1855 netiquette : porcodio NON si scrive una mail per
>> sottoscrivere quello che dice il "pinna" di turno.
>
>     - Wait overnight to send emotional responses to messages.  If you
>       have really strong feelings about a subject, indicate it via
>       FLAME ON/OFF enclosures.  For example:
>       FLAME ON:  This type of argument is not worth the bandwidth
>                  it takes to send it.  It's illogical and poorly
>                  reasoned.  The rest of the world agrees with me.
>       FLAME OFF

>
>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     - Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
>       with a carriage return.

>
>>
>>
>> ed il cambio di data HM?
>
>     - Mail should have a subject heading which reflects
>       the content of the message.

>
>
> Non so se questa mia email infranga la RFC1855:
>     - Don't get involved in flame wars.  Neither post nor respond
>       to incendiary material.
> preferisco pensare che ti sto semplicemente aiutando a capire come 
> funzioni la netiquette.

>

concordo.

$witch

--
Alessandro Spinella

Communication Valley S.p.A.
"Societa' soggetta all'attivita' di direzione e coordinamento di Kyneste S.p.A."
Security Service Provider
Strada Quarta 6/1D
43100 - Parma Italy
Tel +39 0521 4980
Fax +39 0521 498080