isi e xavi:
>https://medium.com/@thomas.bushnell/a-reflection-on-the-departure-of-rms-18e6a835fd84
Questo:
> RMS treated the problem as being “let’s make sure we don’t criticize
> Minsky unfairly”, when the problem was actually, “how can we come to
> terms with a history of MIT’s institutional neglect of its
> responsibilities toward women and its apparent complicity with
> Epstein’s crimes”. While it is true we should not treat Minsky
> unfairly, it was not — and is not — a pressing concern, and by making
> it his concern, RMS signaled clearly that it was much more important
> to him than the question of the institution’s patterns of problematic
> coddling of bad behavior.
mi pare che spieghi abbastanza bene il punto: dover per forza dire la
propria su una questione quantomeno spinosa, addentrandosi in
disquisizioni assurde, ignorando il problema strutturale
bachi
--
boyska
