We tried the stripped down version. We process data in chunks but stripped
down version only provides the method which processes data all at once. Had
to make some changes to make it work for our use case but it's giving us a
different hash. Will debug it on Monday.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:15 AM, anonym <anonym@???> wrote:
> Uzair Farooq:
> > Hey, we checked the forge library (the one they listed as the fastest in
> > their benchmark). To my surprise it improved the time darastically. It
> took
> > a little more than 1 minute on a core i3 machine with 4GB RAM. We have
> > pushed latest changes to the repo
> > https://github.com/usman-subhani/verification-extension
> Hey, that sounds brilliant!
>
> FWIW, while I was researching possible solutions I stumbled upon:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18338890/are-there-
> any-sha-256-javascript-implementations-that-are-generally-considered-t
>
> which lead me to this 4.5 KB extract of only the parts of forge needed for
> the SHA256 computation:
>
> https://github.com/brillout/forge-sha256
>
> which seems like a worthwhile bloat reduction.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
