Hi,
intrigeri wrote (31 Oct 2014 12:55:44 GMT) :
>> + when "the I2P Browser"
>> + user = "i2pbrowesr"
> XXX
Ooops, I forgot this one. Obviously the test fails, so I think I've
fixed it in e44f97c.
No big deal, but it makes me question how much trust I can put, as
a reviewer, into "I've tested it (both manually and automatically)
very thoroughly" => how much change did happen on this branch *after*
you tested it thoroughly?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri