Hi,
sajolida@??? wrote (27 Feb 2014 11:32:01 GMT) :
> I see that quite a bit of content on this page will evolve with our
> Redmine ticket.
I was careful not to do that too much, and I see only *two* links
to tickets of ours.
> What about having a category related to Debian. So we can have all
> the tickets in one listing.
I see the problem you are describing.
I don't think adding a Debian category would be sensible: the category
field expresses the area of Tails that a given task is about, not the
exact place where the problem must be fixed. E.g. #6507 should be in
the "OpenPGP applet" category, and #5484 is already in the
"browser" one.
Before posting this, I've researched if we could use tags to solve
this problem. There are a few plugins around that add tagging support
to Redmine, but they don't seem well-maintained, so I'd rather not
rely on them.
Another lead could be to add a "Debian" type of work: we already have
an "Upstream" one, which is quite awkward to use, not very well
defined, and stretching the "type of work" logics a bit too much for
my taste. But I don't see anything better we could do.
So, it seems to me that while not very satisfactory, adding a "Debian"
type of work would be our best bet for now, and let's hope tags come
in Redmine soon enough.
Thoughts?
> In the list of packages to maintain what about pidgin-otr? But you know
> better than me.
I believe this is covered by:
"Join the Debian OTR Team, that maintains pidgin-otr, libotr, and more."
> I renamed that category "Developer and maintainer, Software people with
> very diverse skills can improve Tails."
> See b468be7. Feel free to change that again.
Great! Added a link in that section, then (a6d56ba).
Now going to announce that page on the Debian -derivatives and -devel
mailing-lists.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
