Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Freeze ->0.7?

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: intrigeri
Date:  
To: The T\(A\)ILS public development discussion list
Subject: Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Freeze ->0.7?
Hi,

bertagaz@??? wrote (10 Feb 2011 14:41:49 GMT) :
> Commits 9e34169b... to 1d080597... should have closed the todo item
> on implementing memory wiping on media removal. Seems to be ready
> for the freeze :)


Wow, seems nice. Building a test image.

One remaining question: any idea what the impact of the memlockd is on
minimal system requirements for running and using T(A)ILS?

It seems like we don't mention any minimum RAM on the website yet
(though we should) but IIRC 0.5 was useable with 384MB: one could run
iceweasel with a few tabs and Pidgin at the same time.

Squeeze-base builds probably raise the bar a bit, as does the locking
of memory of the files needed for memory wiping on boot media removal.
I am curious how much they do.

Bye,
--
intrigeri <intrigeri@???>
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| We're dreaming of something else.
| Something more clandestine, something happier.