intrigeri:
>> But I'm fine with not removing anything for the time being if it makes
>> it easier to move this discussion forward.
>
> I can live with this trade-off until it becomes a blocker for other
> important things.
>
> I would like to propose a slightly different compromise: instead of
> removing 3 launchers, remove "Terminal" only. I believe it's useless
> to the vast majority of both our current and future users, and
> I expect the more technical subset of our users won't have problems
> finding one of the 3+ other ways to start a terminal. This would give
> us one slot to add a new launcher there next time we need it, and thus
> avoid having to discuss this again too early (and who knows, once
> we're there, perhaps users will be able to persist their changes
> to the list of "Favorites" so we'll agree more easily :)
I'm fine with this middle ground. So, unless segfault strongly
disagrees, let's do that. I updated the description and metadata of
#16990 accordingly.
--
sajolida
Tails —
https://tails.boum.org/
UX · Fundraising · Technical Writing
