Re: [Tails-project] #8948: Reconsider the terminology around…

Borrar esta mensaxe

Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: segfault
Data:  
Para: tails-project
Asunto: Re: [Tails-project] #8948: Reconsider the terminology around "persistence"
sajolida:
> [...]
> I tried to rewrite our examples with "Persistent Storage" and it was
> pretty easy to do. See:
>
> https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/documentation/style_guide/persistent_storage/

I like it!

> We also considered "Persistent Memory", "Persistent Volume", "Persistent
> Drive", "Persistent Vault", and "Persistent Locker" but both Cody and I
> preferred "Persistent Storage".


I agree, "Persistent Storage" feels like the best option - although I
also like "Persistent Volume" for being a bit more technically precise,
but "Storage" is probably easier to understand for users who are not
technically experienced.

Cheers