Hi,
sajolida:
> intrigeri:
>> I'm not convinced the overall effect of underlining "But, not everyone
>> can donate" is positive: it attracts my eye and discourages me from
>> reading the previous sentence.
> I've put an underlined sentence similar messages since our first
> campaign, based on learnings from Wikimedia:
> Search for "examples of incremental" on:
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016-2017_Fundraising_Report
I'm all for using underlined sentences to attract the eye to the
section in general, and to its most relevant/catchy bits in
particular. And I'm really glad you're learning from Wikipedia's
measurements and reports \o/
My concern is about _what_ we underline.
In that example, the underlined sentence ("If everyone reading this
gave $3, we could keep Wikipedia thriving for years to come") conveys
information that's highly relevant in itself: even if I don't read
anything else, I get the idea. "But, not everyone can donate" gives no
self-sufficient info.
> I've removed it from my feature branch but if you feel different about
> it now, please let me know or revert 9b5494c1a2.
I would be fine if we underlined any of the other two sentences in
that paragraph.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
