Re: [Tails-testers] Working Wi-Fi Adapter

On 4/20/19, sajolida <sajolida@???> wrote:

> Ron HulduNet - GM:
>> You are replying to my post , not Jacks.
>
> Yes, but you didn't put Jack in copy of your reply and I'm not sure
> whether they are subscribed to the list.

Then you still should have answered -his- mail, and put whatever
as From , CC and so on, so a thread will be a functional thread.

When you reply to me in a post/mail someone else made, it
makes it seem like -I- wrote the one you are replying to, and
also makes everyone else replying to me, which is a bad thing.


I usually don't use "Reply-to-all" , and myself I've received a bunch
of mails that didn't go to the mailing-list, when they should have.

I see btw your mail was sent to me (To:) and to the list, which
makes me get it twice.

A "normal" way to use a mailing-list is to send -only- to the
list, which then whoever is in that list will get it.
When a question is posted/mailed to a list, one should assume
the sender -is- on that list they are in fact mailing to.

I also see there's a somewhat higher number of SPAM arriving in
the list for being such a small list, which is not a good thing.


I you guys do not want my assistance with all the questions
regarding non-working (or possibly working) Wi-Fi adapters, let
me know.

Right now there's -not- a proper list over chipset's that do work, and
whatever is (was) listed, is listed as N150, N300, N600 and so, which
is a totally unhelpful way to describe a adapter since Nxxx is a network
speed, or by the model# , which in most manufactures changes the
chipset from time to time without any change in the model#, hence
some of the same model# works, some don't...


> --
> sajolida
>


--
... faranno dei cimiteri le loro cattedrali e delle citta le vostre tombe.
"Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes."
“ I wish my head could forget what my eyes have seen”
*"It is not that I have something to hide... I've got nothing I want You to
see"*