Re: [Tails-dev] Memory Hole: strategy and timeline

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Author: intrigeri
Date:  
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor, tails-dev
Old-Topics: Re: [Tails-dev] Memory Hole: strategy and timeline
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Memory Hole: strategy and timeline
Hi,

Daniel Kahn Gillmor (24 May 2018):
> On Mon 2018-02-19 12:00:12 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>>  - A working desktop example should be made widely available, that is
>>    Enigmail 2.0 should:
>>    - be released as stable
>>    - be the default version non-technical users can install via
>>      whatever installation/upgrade methods the Enigmail project
>>      supports
>>    - be available for Debian stable users at least via stretch-backports


> This sounds great. Unfortunately, […]


After months of tireless (and seriously frustrating) efforts, dkg
managed to get Enigmail 2.0 into Debian stable. Congrats!

So the only blocker left for Tails to tweet about this is
the specification.

> I have pushed an implementation for reading protected headers in
> notmuch, which is still waiting for review there. I welcome review on
> the notmuch mailing list.


Great, I'll reply off-list :)

Cheers,
--
intrigeri