Re: [Tails-dev] On re-entry of I2P into Tails

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Autor: Masayuki Hatta
Data:  
Para: tails-dev
Tópicos Antigos: Re: [Tails-dev] On re-entry of I2P into Tails
Assunto: Re: [Tails-dev] On re-entry of I2P into Tails
Hi!

Until recently, some other commitments prevented me from working on
Tails (sorry for 8 months delay since 34C3!), but now I'd like to
resume my effort to re-integrate I2P into Tails.

I got two questions -- both must be quite basic and stupid, but I
appreciate if you could tell me or point me to the relevant
references. Thanks!

1. Git(Lab) work flow

I made a GitLab account, forked Tails/tails repo. Now I made
Tails/tails as upstream and sync'd them well.

$ git clone git@???:masayukihatta/tails.git
$ git remote add upstream git@???:Tails/tails.git
$ git fetch upstream; git merge upstream/master

Then, I think I should work on devel branch. The question is, how to
do? I know there are tons of documents about it, but I'm not sure
what to do (I'm using Git/GitHub regularly, but still I should say
quite a newbie...)

I do

$ git checkout --track upstream/devel

But git fetch or such doesn't really follow the upstream changes.

2. Testing environment

I could build the current Tails and produce ISO image. I can run it
on USB sticks. It's okay, but a bit tiresome. Is there an
established good practice to run/test Tails on VM or such?

Best regards,
MH

2017年11月28日(火) 0:47 intrigeri <intrigeri@???>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Masayuki Hatta:
> > I am a Debian Developer.
>
> Another Debian (+ Tails) developer speaking. Small world, uh :)
>
> > Recently I uploaded I2P for Debian, […]
>
> I've noticed this and I'm very grateful someone eventually tackled
> this.
>
> > I understand the previous (unofficial) Debian maintainer suddenly
> > disappeared last year, and as a result I2P had been removed, not a
> > part of Tails anymore. But I'd like to see I2P in Tails again since
> > Tails is an important and major platform for privacy-savvy users.
>
> > I think I2P itself has been steadily improved, and I have a good
> > relationship with the I2P upstream. Also my packages are in a
> > reasonably good quality (well, at least lintian-free). I'll take care
> > of those packages as much as I'm involved with Debian.
>
> By the way, what's your plan regarding stable releases, starting with
> Buster? (Last time I checked, I2P had no maintenance/LTS release
> branch so I don't know how severe bugs, network compatibility updates,
> and security issues can easily be fixed in a frozen Debian stable.)
>
> > So what can I do to make I2P a part of Tails again? I know Debian
> > things quite well, but I should say I don't know at all about Tails.
> > But I can learn ;-) I appreciate if you would kindly tell me the next
> > step.
>
> When we've removed I2P we've tried to document this on
> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/12264.
>
> Regarding how to contribute to Tails, see
> https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/code/
>
> Cheers,
> --
> intrigeri




--
Masayuki Hatta
Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Management, Surugadai
University, Japan

http://about.me/mhatta

mhatta@??? / mhatta@??? / mhatta@??? /
hatta.masayuki@???