Re: [Tails-dev] DeepOnion project

Nachricht löschen

Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Vaas !
Datum:  
To: tails-dev
Alte Treads: Re: [Tails-dev] DeepOnion project
Betreff: Re: [Tails-dev] DeepOnion project
Hi Tails Project,

We are glad to let your Team know that we were working on the Debian
Repository in the last months with our Development Team and we did a lot of
progress on it. We took your words about doing something first as a way to
earn the trust from your members and who that we want to help and build
something for the good of all with real commitment.
Right now we are even looking for a mentor for Debian (I don't know if some
people from your Team can help us with this) but all the hard work seems to
be done and we are on the testing phase.
We would like to know if one of your Team would like to Talk with us on
Wire, we can set a meeting with our Developers for testing purposes and
then, we can cooperate together for donations (we would like to donate to
your project in reward for some advertisement) and even future improvements.

Hope we can get in touch soon and again, thank you so much for your time.

Best Regards,
Vaas, DeepOnion.org Moderator.


On 22 May 2018 at 03:51, Vaas ! <vaasdls@???> wrote:

> Thanks for your quick response and sorry for writing you back a bit late.
>
> I have been talking with our Developers and they started to work on the
> Debian Repository, we hope this cycle can be good for both of us.
>
> I will send you more details in the future.
>
> Best Regards,
> Vaas, DeepOnion.org Moderator.
>
>
> On 7 May 2018 at 08:10, intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Vaas !:
>> > In the past I contacted your project regarding to donations for your
>> > platform, DeepOnion is an anonymous Cryptocurrency that uses Tor and we
>> > have been donating to the Tor project just to be grateful for their
>> > development, also helping with more Nodes to the network.
>>
>> > People from the Tails Project said that it could work if we create a
>> Debian
>> > Repository for it since your software uses Debian and we can handle this
>> > with our Development Team. I just want to update our conversation, to
>> know
>> > if we should go on with this Development and also if you can consider to
>> > use our Wallet in your pre installed apps (maybe some download app) from
>> > your OS in the future (of course this is not something that you must do
>> but
>> > we would be happy for it since some of our users use Tails).
>>
>> There are two aspects to this:
>>
>> 1. Allowing Tails users to use DeepOnion
>>
>>    Once your client software is in Debian (stable or worst case
>>    stable backports), then Tails users will be able to easily install
>>    and use it. If needed we can ship whatever tiny config file is
>>    needed to make it go through Tor so that it works out of the box.

>>
>>    Creating a third-party Debian repository would also work but using
>>    that is much harder (for Tails users) to set up and the amount of
>>    trust they have to put into your project and its infrastructure is
>>    much greater. So this might be a reasonable first step but I would
>>    suggest you don't stop and that and instead include your software
>>    in Debian proper :)

>>
>> 2. Accepting donations to Tails with DeepOnion
>>
>>    It seems that every cryptocurrency project around there has been
>>    getting in touch with us in the last 2 years, requesting that we
>>    accept donations made with their tool. We work with limited
>>    resources and can definitely not support them all. If somebody
>>    built an unbiased comparison that allowed us to draw a conclusion
>>    like "it would be worth the effort to support cryptocurrency X,
>>    here's how you would do it" then we might do it. But so far I've
>>    not seen this happen. Needless to say, members of cryptocurrency
>>    projects are not the best placed people to build such an unbiased
>>    summary :)

>>
>>    And most of the time, to accept such donations we would need to run
>>    software ourselves that's not in Debian, which our internal teams'
>>    security policy forbids ⇒ point #1 above is relevant here as well.

>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> intrigeri
>>
>
>