Re: [Tails-l10n] [review]FAQ and some updates

intrigeri:

> I expect the branch submitter and reviewer to test that the submitted
> changes works fine (at least it builds, looks fine in a browser, and
> ideally running check_po.sh). To me having a third person do these
> checks is busywork with very limited value; IMO your Tails time and
> mine are more useful in other places :)

I am running check_po and building the wiki for each of the submissions I send to the list. But I can fail on many points:

- I needed to run check_po by hand, and I forget sometimes. But I added it to my pre-commit hook so now it works if I use my usual setup.
- Once I pushed a set of the changes too small, so a header was missing on master, although I had it on local. Now I clean well before testing.

This submissions are a subset of the changes on current weblate repo and I try to do as less changes as possible.