Re: [Tails-ux] Porting DAVE to Web Extensions

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Autor: Uzair Farooq
Data:  
Para: sajolida
CC: anonym, Tails user experience & user interface design
Assunto: Re: [Tails-ux] Porting DAVE to Web Extensions
Hello Sajolida,

I'll share an timeline and quote with you.

Just want to make sure we are on the same page. The main functionality
would be:

- User will download the image from website.
- After the download is complete, user will navigate to the verification
page of extension (say by clicking on extension icon).
- User will select the downloaded file and extension will let user know if
the image is valid or not.

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:02 PM, sajolida <sajolida@???> wrote:

> intrigeri:
> > sajolida:
> >> So, merging here the other technical details that anonym and Uzair
> >> exchanged off-list we have to choose between the following
> >> two options.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for this summary :)
> >
> >> Option A. Keep the download inside DAVE relying on the File and
> > [...]
> >>   - We're downloading in memory so users need ~1GB of RAM
> >>     to download.

> >
> > IMO that's a deal breaker: requiring 1.1GiB of free memory usable by
> > the web browser feels significantly worse than the UX regression
> > brought by option B.
> >
> >> I would say we should do option B.
> >
> > Fully agreed.
>
> Ok, so since I wrote my summary Uzair found a serious technical
> limitation in option A and intrigeri thinks there is a serious UX deal
> breaker in option A as well.
>
> We're left with option B. Long live option B!
>
> Uzair: Do you need anything else before being able to send us a quote of
> how much work this migration would represent along with a calendar
> proposal?
>
> The way we worked when developing the original extension was that tchou
> and me we doing all the UX, HTML, and CSS work, providing Giorgio Maone
> with a prototype page where relevant and he was only doing the coding
> work on the extension.
>
> I propose we do the same this time as well. Tchou is missing in action
> but I guess I can do the HTML and CSS work and anonym can review the
> whole thing :)
>
> We would be interested in a quote for the migration to Web Extensions on
> the one hand but also for the port to Chrome, as a possible additional
> work.
>
> If you need to continue the technical/UX debate do it here. Otherwise
> for the quote, please write to tails-accounting@??? putting
> anonym@??? in copy.
>