Hi there,
(First time poster, I've been lurking for a while)
These interviews are interesting to read. I've read the previous ones also.
I've noticed in the "intercept interview" definition there isn't a mention of getting participant consent. Is it mentioned somewhere else?
It's important to get consent from participant when giving specific information about them.
This is invisible and often overlooked but it is very valuable in building empathy with the interview participant.
It is the interviewer saying "you, the participant, are in control".
About specifying detail, when I interview people, unless the detail is important I "fuzz" this kind of detail.
E.g. instead of saying "Bernard is 28 years old and lives in Brazil" I transcribe "Participant 8 is male, aged 25-30 and lives in a South American country."
Also, just curious, what questions did you want to answer with this interview?
Thanks!
Bernard
On 18 Jun 2017 08:29, intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sajolida:
> > * You put "Brazil" and what look like precise age of participants. Until
> > now I was only putting continents and not putting ages. I think it was a
> > mistake for me not to put ages so I'll try to remember that in the
> > future. About the country vs continent, do you think I was being overly
> > careful?
>
> IMO anything the interviewed people are comfortable with is OK.
>
> > * Out of curiosity: which process did you use to get people's consent on
> > publishing your notes? Did you ask them to review them on the spot, over
> > email, not at all. Was it a concern for them?
>
> I sent them the draft over email, as documented on the blueprint.
> Two of them asked me to do minor changes, which I did.
>
> > * I couldn't find the email of these people in the internal Git repo.
>
> I added them on May 8 (6dfdc8f) so perhaps your working copy is outdated.
>
> > * How did you feel about these interviews: did you enjoy them? did you
> > learn things? are you excited about doing this again?
>
> Yes * 3!
>
> > Some comments on specific people:
>
> > * Miguel, "the website translation workflow is hard": so he is a Tails
> > translator as well? Or tried to be one and failed? That's not in his
> > intro but seems important to mention.
>
> I don't remember, sorry.
>
> > * Sophia, "security slider set to High, JavaScript disabled by default":
> > do you think these are sound requirements for her or exaggerated?
>
> She's well aware of the trade-offs involved by disabling JS and
> I trust she's able to make sensible security decisions according to
> her needs. Hence the request for "a persistent setting for these
> settings".
>
> > * Sophia, "LibreOffice Impress templates/themes": would additional
> > software solve this?
>
> I have no idea where the missing templates/themes are available, sorry.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> intrigeri
> _______________________________________________
> Tails-ux mailing list
> Tails-ux@???
> https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-ux
