Re: [Tails-testers] testing tails 3.0 alpha1

> anonym:
>> eraram@???:
>>> I was also thinking to upgrade a key with an already fully parametred
>>> and
>>> well used persitance partition. It will allow me to make more advanced
>>> test quicker, but you may say me that's stupidy and far too risky. What
>>> do
>>> you think?
>
>> This is useful testing. We want the transition from Tails 2.x to 3.0 to
>> be smooth -- that includes migration of persistence features.
>
> Right. However, we provide no security support for 3.0 alpha releases;
> e.g. alpha1 includes a version of Tor Browser that has known
> security issues. I want to change this starting with 3.0~beta1, that
> will have security updates, but won't be supported by our help desk ⇒
> the right place to report issues will still be this mailing list.

Thanks for the precision.
Concerning this precise issues if Iunderstood well, it will affect users
using javascript right? It should not be a big problem if it's desactived
on my tor-browser isn't it?

And in the case I should care about it and if I want to integrate this
(and future) security update on a fixed tails 3.0 is there a way to do it?

Thanks again!