Hi,
>>
>> Spencer:
>> blueprint should contain the personas
>>
>
> sajolida:
> Yes.
>
Word.
>>
>> the ticket should contain the development
>> structure:
> where we are, who's responsible for
> moving things forward, are we waiting for a review,
> etc.
>
Word.
>
> in-depth discussion should be on the mailing list.
>
Word.
I think the logic behind the personas belongs on the blueprint, yes?
>
> Maybe a first step would be to move tchou's personas to
> http://tails.boum.org/blueprint/personas.
>
Will do, after some time; prioritising the Greeter phase transition and
Tails startup flow.
>
> detail
>
I agree. I think we should do less, even.
>
> https://medium.com
>
Actively MITMs, so I am unable to follow your link; do these live
elsewhere, for pointing purposes?
Tails' could be this.
I do have them locally, though, and have extracted the section labels
FTR:
• Name (First)
- Pic (Monochromatic Gestural Illustration)
- Age (General)
- Nationality
- Occupation (Social)
- Occupation (Private)
- Activity
- Context
- Quote
• Technology Expertise
• Technology Use
• Access Locations
• Threats From Technology Use
• Physical Threats
• Needs
• Infographic (Persona Characteristics)
- X (Technical Expertise)
- Y (Privacy Needs)
Wordlife,
Spencer
