BitingBird: > Has someone checked the warning page recently? We worked on it 6 months
> ago, and it starts with "Tails does not protect against compromised
> hardware", then "Tails can be compromised if installed or plugged in
> untrusted systems" and "Tails does not protect against BIOS or firmware
> attacks". So I think you're all proposing to add things that are already
> there, no?
No, I don't want to add anything. I want to remove the constraint that
physical access is necessary to compromise the hardware in the first answer.
