Hey,
I corrected the part about the pinentry decision.
cheers
emmapeel:
>
>
> emmapeel:
>> here you go!
>>
>> please add things you find missing...
>>
>>
> maybe i was not clear enough on the subject... please review the
> attachment and merge or correct...
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tails-dev mailing list
> Tails-dev@???
> https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
> To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to Tails-dev-unsubscribe@???.
>
>From 42b117c8d6dc31c2ac9f84bc61e1987f6fe0907b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: emma peel <emmapeel@???>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:09:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 2016 March meeting notes
---
wiki/src/contribute/meetings/201603.mdwn | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 wiki/src/contribute/meetings/201603.mdwn
diff --git a/wiki/src/contribute/meetings/201603.mdwn b/wiki/src/contribute/meetings/201603.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..beaa8c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wiki/src/contribute/meetings/201603.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+1. Volunteers to handle "Hole in the roof" tickets this month
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+
+- anonym might already have dealt with [[!tails_ticket 7182]]: Identical branch HEADs can result in Vagrant building from the wrong branch
+- intrigeri is working on [[!tails_ticket 5650]] (rngd)
+- bertagaz is also working in background on [[!tails_ticket 7675]]
+- [[!tails_ticket 6311]] is better done after [[!tails_ticket 6310]]
+
+2. Volunteers to handle important tickets flagged for next release, but without assignee
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+- [[!tails_ticket 11075]]: Remove "Power Off" and "Reboot" from Applications â System Tools: we finally didn't had time to deal with this.
+- [[!tails_ticket 11175]]: Decrease I/O load created by isotesters on lizard - this one was meant for bertagaz.
+
+3. Availability and plans until the next meeting
+------------------------------------------------
+
+- intrigeri: in March I should be mostly available for Tails. focus on SponsorS deliverables (mainly: freezable APT repo). except I'll have 1 week "off" (with lots time with new/wannabe contributors)
+- emmapeel is frontdesk,Valencia, translators, doc tickets, translation worflow
+- sajolida
+0. Refine the ideal workflow and review early mockups on [[network connection|
https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/network_connection/]] (on Sunday).
+1. Make plans on what to do now and what to postpone regarding IA+DAVE.
+2. Invoice the two latest funders milestone.
+3. Start working on the redesign of the download page.
+- muri: iff, beach, cij; then clearing translation backlog; doing some other tickets i've on my watchlist; also thinking about writing a small python keysingning ui
+- anonym: I expect to be available all non-weekends all of March. I'll re-focus again on test suite robustness work, particularly on [[!tails_ticket 9521]] and trying out dogtail a bit more ([[!tails_ticket 7729]], [[!tails_ticket 10721]]). it also looks like I'll work on Icedove integration, unexpectedly. And look at Tails verifier.
+- ticketbot: Tails ⺠Feature #9521: Use the chutney Tor network simulator in our test suite
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/9521
+- ticketbot: Tails ⺠Feature #7729: Evaluate using LDTP and/or dogtail to improve our automated test suite
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7729
+- ticketbot: Tails ⺠Feature #10721: Improve automated GUI testing robustness using "GUI aware" technologies
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/10721
+- segfault: I will have more time in the next month than in february. I still want to work on the boot and upgrade process and on Tails server [[!tails_ticket 5688]]). And I'm looking forward to the review of the Tails verifier :)
+- bertagaz: March, mostly available hopefully, but focused on the monitoring deployment
+
+Discuss
+-------
+
+[[!tails_ticket 11047]]: Decide if we want to have monthly reports and who should edit them
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+- Everybody likes reports, but nobody gives input for them. Maybe a report that is incomplete is ok.
+- sajolida feels is a lot of effort to go through the logs or ask people for input.
+- Many of the 5 people that committed to make reports is not on this meeting so we skip the decision...
+- sajolida: is happy to manage the April report (or March) even, but somebody has to handle the weight of the Feb report
+
+[[!tails_ticket 11099]] Decide which pinentry we want to ship
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+
+- This and other related pinentry tickets will be taken by segfault. We decided to use pinentry-gtk2 with the --no-global-grab option, which fixes #11038. We preferred this over pinentry-gnome3, because pinentry-gnome3 grabs the mouse, which would be a UX regression for KeePassX users.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+- intrigeri takes it
+
+
--
2.1.4
