Spencer:
> I sent this in private and figured it was now relevant to make public.
As a general rule, be careful when publishing private conversations. See
« Similarly, don't publish private communication without asking first »
from
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/working_together/code_of_conduct/.
But this time I think it won't be problematic.
>> sajolida:
>> I would really like to have some personas made public for the project.
>
> This is good; me too.
>
>> think [tchou's] are great,
>
> Yep.
I think that tchou was reluctant to make them public because he thought
they were not nice enough, at some point they were mostly in French, and
he feared of endless discussions over email until we get to an agreement.
Yesterday at the Tor UX meeting several people showed interest in
working on this during the Tor meeting in Valencia at the end of the
month. Search for "persona" in
http://meetbot.debian.net/tor-project/2016/tor-project.2016-02-16-15.00.log.html.
If this happens, I'll definitely show them tchou's work. Unless he's
against the idea.
> In theory, we would create as many personas as needed to cover the
> community. However, since we don't have this data either, forking what
> is available from other communities/projects, merging that with the work
> tchou has done, and continuing to refine the resulting content as we
> move forward is a good approach for us since it provides both short and
> long-term resolutions.
+1!
>> I'd like to put tchou's document in a Redmine ticket
>> for future work on this. Would this be fine?
>
> I reviewed what tchou created with a UXpert, who provided some
> interesting insight, and would like to work with
> you, and everyone interested, on busting these out.
What does this mean in practice? Do you have written notes of this
insight? Plans of action with them?
