sajolida: > intrigeri:
>> flapflap wrote (03 Nov 2015 20:21:35 GMT) :
>>> What's the reason to mention "circuits and connections"; wouldn't just
>>> "circuits:" suffice? To me, this sounds redundant...
>>
>> Note that a circuit may be established without being used for
>> a connection (technically: a stream) yet.
>
> Exactly, in the screenshot for example:
>
> - PiratenNDS2,AxleRelay3,DFRI3 is circuit
> - irc.oftc.net:6697 is a connection
>
> Does that make sense?
