[Tails-ux] Privacy Popovers

Delete this message

Reply to this message
Autor: Spencer
Data:  
Dla: tails-ux
Nowe tematy: [Tails-ux] GtkSwitch vs Yes/No (was: privacy Popovers)
Temat: [Tails-ux] Privacy Popovers
Hi,

>
> Alan:
> I see: you click the "+", then you have a dialog:
>
> +-----------------------------------------+
> |       Add custom privacy setting        |
> +-----------------------------------------+
> | Please select your setting type         |
> | +-------------------------------------+ |
> | | Administrative account              | |
> | +-------------------------------------+ |
> | | MAC Spoofing                        | |
> | +-------------------------------------+ |
> | | Network configuration               | |
> | +-------------------------------------+ |
> | | Windows camouflage                  | |
> | +-------------------------------------+ |
> +-----------------------------------------+

>
> I propose exactly the way the "Add account" is in GNOME 3.18.
>
> It's basically your proposal with one less click because all the list
> is displayed. I don't think that it would cover the other window.
>


Can you confirm that this[0] is the dialog.

>
> Makes sense too. As a programmer, I see Gtk.Popover are not a subclass
> of Gtk.Window as Gtk.Dialog are, but now that I read you I see it makes
> few difference for the user.
>


Maybe Gtk.Dialog should be a subclass of Gtk.Window; they discuss the UI
this way on their HIG :)

>
> Because it's the standard way to select a boolean option.
>


If they read the same and have two opposing states then I see no
difference between the two, on paper.

However, in use, two separate paths ('Yes/No' buttons) are different
than two connected states ('On/Off' switch).

And this is how the other dialogs work from what I see; switches seem
used for simpler things that don't need explanation.

Also, I find it difficult to create natural language text that leads up
to an 'On/Off' switch; asking 'Yes/No' questions is really easy. Maybe
sajolida can help with this.

With this said, I am not intimately familiar with the logic behind GNOME
designations, so it may be that because there are opposing options (path
or state) that a switch is the interface element to use even though a
question might be more natural. If this is the case, then no worries :)

Wordlife,
Spencer