On 05/31/2015 09:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> * we're not very clear what the first component means (1.0 had
> a well-defined meaning, no idea what 2.0 will be; we're currently
> using 2.0 and 3.0 on our roadmap to make mid/long-term perspectives
> and goals more readable to everyone involved, but that doesn't
> mean we'll indeed release ISOs labeled 2.0 and 3.0 when we reach
> them; I know that's confusing, sorry)
I think it would be much nicer to leave the version numbers for actual
releases, and use descriptive milestone names for larger visions that
currently do not have a set Tails release, something like:
* 2.0 => Tails_maintainability
* 3.0 => Tails_hardening
* 4.0 => Tails_jessie
Cheers!
