On Sun, 31 May 2015 18:32:20 +0000 (UTC)
intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
> IMO the only option we have is to acknowledge that a public,
> open-membership mailing-list will always end up being publicly
> archived, somehow. And then, we must adjust our communication wrt.
> that mailing-list so that it doesn't lie.
IMHO, unless the emails are encrypted it's safe(st) to assume they
could be archived publicly even if unintentionally like Statfor, Sony,
Journolist.
> And once we're there, we can as well enable public archives in our own
> Mailman interface, to make it easier for anyone who wants to look into
> them to do so... and potentially avoid a few duplicate questions
> being asked.
>
> Thoughts, opinions, feelings, concrete proposals?
