On Fri, 29 May 2015 15:19:43 +0000 (UTC)
intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
> Perhaps we should call all our expected releases a.b.c, and "bonus"
> intermediary releases a.b.c.d? In the case at hand, instead of 1.3,
> 1.3.1 and 1.3.2, this would have given 1.3.0, 1.3.0.1, and 1.3.1.
As long as Tails doesn't decide to switch to Firefox or Chrome
versioning, I'm good. :)
What you're suggesting is completely sensible.
"Which version of Tails are you seeing that in?"
"Tails 61.0.25223978297"
