On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:01:44 +0000 "sajolida"
<sajolida@???> wrote:
>I'm replacing this in the thread it belongs. ghostlands, please do
>"Reply" to this email if you want to stay in the loop.
>
>PS: And please reply inline (below the quote) as we usually do.
>
>ghostlands@???:
>> Hi, random lurker speaking up here with a question.
>>
>> I don't mean to distract from the topic, but regarding
>> interoperability, what about FreeOTFE? It's source was
>available,
>> and someone else has picked it up and forked it on GitHub as
>> DoxBox: https://github.com/t-d-k/doxbox
>>
>> Is there any consideration underway to support this solution and
>> its development? I know it wouldn't solve all of the issues with
>> the absence of TrueCrypt, but it certainly would broaden the
>> relevance of LUKS.
>
>Right, if we're left with interoperability as the main reason to
>stick
>with the TrueCrypt disk format, then we might as well look at this
>option the other way around and advertise tools to open LUKS on
>other
>operating systems.
>
>--
>sajolida
How's this? :)
No interest in my DoxBox suggestion/question, though? I'm curious
if anyone here thinks this is code worth using or even just paying
attention to. It is literally the only serious LUKS implementation
for Windows, it seems possibly important.
ghostlands
