intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> Muri Nicanor wrote (29 Mar 2015 10:32:29 GMT) :
>> On 03/28/2015 05:50 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>>> Muri Nicanor wrote (26 Mar 2015 16:55:45 GMT) :
>>>>> SHOULD
>>>>> ======
>>> [...]
>>>> i think it also would be great to have some kind of bug reporting
>>>> feature for missing strings, missing pages, wrong or outdated
>>>> translations...
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand correctly what this idea is about:
>>>
>>> * Who would be the target audience?
>>> (Users, and/or translators, and/or anyone else?)
>> all of those ;) anyone who finds a bug in translations and wants to
>> report it (like the bug reports in redmine - oke, i just saw, that there
>> is already a 'translate' tag in redmine...)
>
> OK, I see. Let's try to define the problem better before we jump to
> candidate solutions. I see three potential problems:
>
> * letting users report about problems in translations: IMO it's
> simpler for users if they just do it using the existing bug
> reporting channels; our troubleshooting doc would become too
> complicated IMO if we need to tell users "to report translation
> issues, go there and use this tool; to report other kinds of
> issues, go to that other place and use that other tool"
>
> * letting translators know about problems reported by users: it's
> front-desk's job to forward such reports to the relevant people,
> including -l10n@
>
> * translators' todo-list management: we have Redmine if anyone
> needs this.
>
> So, I'm very much unconvinced that we need yet another bug
> reporting tool.
ack! thanks for clarifying this.
>>> * Who would receive and handle such bug reports?
>> well, tails-l10n@??? ;)
