Hi,
Muri Nicanor wrote (29 Mar 2015 10:32:29 GMT) :
> On 03/28/2015 05:50 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Muri Nicanor wrote (26 Mar 2015 16:55:45 GMT) :
>>>> SHOULD
>>>> ======
>> [...]
>>> i think it also would be great to have some kind of bug reporting
>>> feature for missing strings, missing pages, wrong or outdated
>>> translations...
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand correctly what this idea is about:
>>
>> * Who would be the target audience?
>> (Users, and/or translators, and/or anyone else?)
> all of those ;) anyone who finds a bug in translations and wants to
> report it (like the bug reports in redmine - oke, i just saw, that there
> is already a 'translate' tag in redmine...)
OK, I see. Let's try to define the problem better before we jump to
candidate solutions. I see three potential problems:
* letting users report about problems in translations: IMO it's
simpler for users if they just do it using the existing bug
reporting channels; our troubleshooting doc would become too
complicated IMO if we need to tell users "to report translation
issues, go there and use this tool; to report other kinds of
issues, go to that other place and use that other tool"
* letting translators know about problems reported by users: it's
front-desk's job to forward such reports to the relevant people,
including -l10n@
* translators' todo-list management: we have Redmine if anyone
needs this.
So, I'm very much unconvinced that we need yet another bug
reporting tool.
>> * Who would receive and handle such bug reports?
> well, tails-l10n@??? ;)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
