Thanks Thomas White. I also remembered one more:
56ckl5obj37gypcu.onion. That makes five Electrum servers that can be
accessed by a Tor hidden service. Jurre, do you think that we could add
this “feature” to the roadmap for Tails targeted for Tails 1.4
[
https://labs.riseup.net/code/projects/tails/roadmap#Tails_1.4]?
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:52:52 +0000
Minoru <minoru@???> wrote:
> Jurre,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. Technically, this is more of a feature
> than a bug. I actually emailed the Tails-bugs email address about the
> Electrum SPV vulnerability and they said that they like to focus on
> problems with Tails specifically, not software built on top of Tails.
> Also, yes, I would love to help Tails. That is why I have been
> emailing about Electrum. However, I can only contribute
> “documentation” about how bitcoin works and propose solutions to
> problems. Someone else would need to write the code.
>
>
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:37:10 +0000
> Minoru <minoru@???> wrote:
>
> > I was able to find three Electrum servers that support Tor hidden
> > services:
> > electrumupzx5w5f.onion
> > kngqe2mrt4wnpxtt.onion
> > k33y7ns2ma65xgtr.onion
> > I have not received a reply to my last email
> > [https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2015-March/008302.html]
> > about my proposal for a complete solution to the DoS problem using
> > trusted Electrum servers connected by a Tor hidden service.
> > Sajolida, do you have any updates about giving users the option to
> > connect Electrum to .onion servers? Could we present a dialogue
> > like the warning about Tails persistence before the client starts
> > up?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Minoru
