Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 12:03:12 GMT) :
> Ack, sounds reasonable. However from what I've seen, it sometimes means a
> lot of branches so I wonder if we scaled our infra enough for that, as we
> didn't include this branches in our maths since the beginning of the
> discussion.

This seems like a serious bug in this discussion process. May you
please then provide example numbers that match what the proposed
algorithm would output, so that we can reason about it?