Re: [Tails-dev] What do we miss to replace Vidalia [was: Get…

intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
> Alan wrote (09 Feb 2015 20:57:52 GMT) :
> > Do we miss something else to replace Vidalia ?
>
> It would make sense to look at the Vidalia bugs we've suffering from
> for years, to ensure we can drop our workarounds. E.g. the fact
> Vidalia doesn't auto-reconnect to Tor when the latter is restarted
> (#7614).

I implemented an automatic reconnection mechanism, and then broke it
when adding SOCKS support - but I thought about it?

Do you now a list of other workarounds?

Cheers