Hi,
sajolida <sajolida@???> wrote:
> spencerone@???:
> >> I implemented a first prototype. Please have a look at
> >> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7550#note-9
>
> Woh! Big up!
>
Thanks for your quick comments.
> > My next thoughts are about the use of the dotted line in the
> > depressed/active states of buttons. If the dotted line is an indicator
> > in addition to the inner drop shadow, such as in the active state of the
> > 'Basic' button in greeter1.png and the 'Advanced' button in
> > greeter2.png, then it would be beneficial to include it in every screen
> > in which buttons are depressed/active, such as the depressed/active
> > states of the 'Basic' and 'Keyboard' buttons in greeter3.png.
>
> I think that the dotted line in the first image is either a glitch or
> some temporary state because it doesn't happen on the second image.
> Again Alan probably reused the default behavior of GNOME buttons here.
>
I don't understand where do you see dotted lines? Could you clarify?
> Alan, I'm myself concerned about the width of this popup. Remember that
> some keyboard description has super long such as
>
> "Arabic (Morocco) - Berber (Morocco, Tifinagh alternative phonetic)"
>
> So we need to take this into consideration and probably have a much
> wider popup across the main window. Sorry for your nice alignment :)
>
In an upcoming refinement of these prototypes I'll add real values
to see the result, then we'll have a basis for discussion.
> > Though, if there is a
> > 'Search' field for one language list, such as in the widget that appears
> > during the active state of the 'Keyboard' button in greeter3.png, then
> > it seems logical to include it in the other, such as in the Language
> > selection of TAILS in both greeter1.png and greeter3.png.
>
> That makes sense, but on the other hand this would add an extra widget
> to the screen so maybe we can find something better.
>
I think it would be worth considerating. GNOME HIG reads: "If the list
is long, make it possible to search it using the standard search design pattern."
> > My last thought, without getting into the IA, is about the main
> > navigation of the greeter. With the addition of the 'Close' 'X', the
> > top right corner seems a bit crowded. I am not sure of a [re]solution
> > just yet, but, as we move forward with the broader IA structure, it
> > should come to the light.
>
> I think that we don't need the 'X' in the top right corner. Maybe it was
> tricky for Alan to implement a prototype without it but it should
> definitely be removed as it does make sense in the context of the Greeter.
>
Right.
%20-%20Berber%20(Morocco,%20Tifinagh%20alternative%20phonetic)%22%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20So%20we%20need%20to%20take%20this%20into%20consideration%20and%20probably%20have%20a%20much%0A>%20>%20wider%20popup%20across%20the%20main%20window.%20Sorry%20for%20your%20nice%20alignment%20:)%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20In%20an%20upcoming%20refinement%20of%20these%20prototypes%20I'll%20add%20real%20values%0A>%20to%20see%20the%20result,%20then%20we'll%20have%20a%20basis%20for%20discussion.%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20>%20Though,%20if%20there%20is%20a%0A>%20>%20>%20'Search'%20field%20for%20one%20language%20list,%20such%20as%20in%20the%20widget%20that%20appears%0A>%20>%20>%20during%20the%20active%20state%20of%20the%20'Keyboard'%20button%20in%20greeter3.png,%20then%0A>%20>%20>%20it%20seems%20logical%20to%20include%20it%20in%20the%20other,%20such%20as%20in%20the%20Language%0A>%20>%20>%20selection%20of%20TAILS%20in%20both%20greeter1.png%20and%20greeter3.png.%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20That%20makes%20sense,%20but%20on%20the%20other%20hand%20this%20would%20add%20an%20extra%20widget%0A>%20>%20to%20the%20screen%20so%20maybe%20we%20can%20find%20something%20better.%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20I%20think%20it%20would%20be%20worth%20considerating.%20GNOME%20HIG%20reads:%20%22If%20the%20list%0A>%20is%20long,%20make%20it%20possible%20to%20search%20it%20using%20the%20standard%20search%20design%20pattern.%22%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20>%20My%20last%20thought,%20without%20getting%20into%20the%20IA,%20is%20about%20the%20main%0A>%20>%20>%20navigation%20of%20the%20greeter.%20%20With%20the%20addition%20of%20the%20'Close'%20'X',%20the%0A>%20>%20>%20top%20right%20corner%20seems%20a%20bit%20crowded.%20%20I%20am%20not%20sure%20of%20a%20%5Bre%5Dsolution%0A>%20>%20>%20just%20yet,%20but,%20as%20we%20move%20forward%20with%20the%20broader%20IA%20structure,%20it%0A>%20>%20>%20should%20come%20to%20the%20light.%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20>%20I%20think%20that%20we%20don't%20need%20the%20'X'%20in%20the%20top%20right%20corner.%20Maybe%20it%20was%0A>%20>%20tricky%20for%20Alan%20to%20implement%20a%20prototype%20without%20it%20but%20it%20should%0A>%20>%20definitely%20be%20removed%20as%20it%20does%20make%20sense%20in%20the%20context%20of%20the%20Greeter.%0A>%20>%20%0A>%20Right.%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Reply to this message")