sajolida:
> u:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>>> >> anonym: more browsers with specific purposes => more things for the user
>>> >> to keep in their heads w.r.t. browsing, which is something they probably
>>> >> would expect to only have *one* browser for. I don't think these
>>> >> separations we make are intuitive unless you have some pretty deep
>>> >> knowledge about Tor, networks and the threats model we have here.
>>> >>
>>> >> intrigeri: I agree. OTOH, once you already have educated users to pick
>>> >> among two browsers, going to 3 isn't that much a big deal, perhaps.
>>> >>
>>> >> I can see a small tendency towards combining Unsafe and LAN. So, shall
>>> >> we try to find UX arguments in favor of separating them maybe? Then we
>>> >> can count points :)
>> >
>> > Summary: I agree with anonym.
> Anybody else? tchou?
>
(back on Tails, sorry for the lag.)
Hey,
Seems that there is a decision to acces LAN with the Unsafe Browser.
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8218#note-7
Maybe we will need to have a way to warm the user when he try to access
the LAN from the Tor Browser that he has to use the Unsafe Browser and
why. Maybe a little firefox extension ?
I'll add that the last time I needed to use the local network was to use
Gobby. I don't know when and how it would be possible.
Cheers,
Tchou
> -- sajolida _______________________________________________ Tails-ux
> mailing list Tails-ux@??? https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-ux
>
--
tchou
