On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:44:03 +0000 (UTC)
Kill Your TV <killyourtv@???> wrote:
> The proper fix will be to have the wrapper package additionally allow
> for the *-headless jre/jdk packages to be used. (My packages also need
> to be fixed to allow the -headless packages as alternate deps; I'll
> add that resultant patch to the 'please update the wrapper packages'
> that I'm going to file with the upstream DD).
Earlier today[0] I filed the wishlist bug[1] to get the wrapper
updated, and it's already closed (and getting uploaded to
unstable). The control file didn't have java7-headless as an option so
that was included in my patch (default-jre-headless and
java6-runtime-headless were added as alternates by me back when I filed
the wishlist "please update the wrapper" bug in the Debian BTS
earier this year).
Since it has been uploaded to unstable, once it trickles down to jessie
(or wheezy-backports) the openjdk-7-jre package can be changed to
openjdk-7-jre-headless which should save a bit more space on the ISOs.
(OpenJDK7 probably won't be pulled in automatically until Jessie).
[0] It took awhile because I wanted to make sure I had everything
done correctly (with as little work needed for the DD as I could
manage). Now...hopefully the non-x86 systems that I can't test don't
FTBFS.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759565
--
GPG ID: 0x5BF72F42D0952C5A
Fingerprint: BD12 65FD 4954 C40A EBCB F5D7 5BF7 2F42 D095 2C5A
