Re: [Tails-dev] Why OnionCat + Mumble - why not just Mumble…

Borrar esta mensaxe

Responder a esta mensaxe
Autor: bancfc
Data:  
Para: tails-dev
Asunto: Re: [Tails-dev] Why OnionCat + Mumble - why not just Mumble?
On 2014-08-16 14:00, bancfc@??? wrote:
> On 2014-08-16 00:38, bancfc@??? wrote:
>> On 2014-08-15 15:22, bancfc@??? wrote:
>>> On 2014-08-14 23:26, bancfc@??? wrote:
>>>> Hi. I found out why onioncat wasn't working and configured it
>>>> accordingly with help from Bernhard. It was a peculiarity that had
>>>> to
>>>> do with our specific two machine design.
>>>>
>>>> Now VOIP works. Linphone is what we'll be using. Thought I'd tell
>>>> you
>>>> so you guys can add that too.
>>>>
>>>> Details:
>>>> https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,407.msg3360.html#msg3360
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the Linphone version in Debian stable does not have
>>> zrtp
>>> support. But wouldn't Hidden Services and onioncat be providing the
>>> authentication layer?
>>>
>>> Note that Linphone does have a text messaging mode but its completely
>>> plaintext. Again it shouldn't matter if what I'm saying about Hidden
>>> Services is correct.
>>
>> More interesting information on the functionality of VOIP clients. you
>> might like to factor them into your blueprint
>> https://www.whonix.org/forum/index.php/topic,407.msg3396.html#msg3396
>
> You are right. Please make a backport and I will work on instructions
> for authentication.


Here is what Bernhard says about authentication:
https://www.whonix.org/w/index.php?title=OnionCat&stable=0&shownotice=1&fromsection=Security#Security

A backport is necessary to take advantage of it. A backport of linphone
is nice too, but not strictly necessary as the first. Even if untested
your linphone backport is very likely to work so please include it too.