Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge doc/wheezy

Hi,

sajolida@??? wrote (13 Jul 2014 12:41:29 GMT) :
> intrigeri wrote:
>> Technically (as you very well know :), we're shipping GNOME 3, but
>> running it in Fallback mode. Do you think it's worth mentioning?
>> Granted, it would be more important to mention on the About page than
>> on this one
>> (doc/first_steps/introduction_to_gnome_and_the_tails_desktop), but I'm
>> wondering how wrong it is to make Tails users think that *this* is how
>> GNOME 3 is supposed to look like.

> Done in 3d7f1cc.

(History rewritten, commit ids changed... anyway :)

Good. I've fixed the HTML in 565d03b.

>>> The <span class="guisubmenu">System Tools</span> submenu allows you to customize
>>> the GNOME desktop or the system.
>>
>> How about making it clear that such customization won't survive
>> a reboot? (No, that's not a regression brought by this branch, just
>> mentioning it in passing, as I wonder how much this sentence accounts
>> for the numerous reports we have of "my customizition are forgotten".)

> Done in ef79ca6.

I can find this commit neither with that ID, nor on doc/wheezy.

>> Regarding commit 98dafca, I wonder if maybe two different note divs
>> would be better, since the two notes added there are actually
>> orthogonal. BTW, I would put the second one first, as it seems more
>> important to me, and maybe use a warning styling (assuming we have
>> one) rather than a note.

> Done in c7f341d.

Same, cannot find it.

>> Regarding commit 0d2cb74 ("Remove big bullet points"), I'm curious
>> why. I only have heard good things about this clear indication that
>> one is making progress through a step-by-step process. OTOH, given
>> bc5b8e9, I get why we don't want two different numberings.

> The idea here was to keep using them on very special pages like the
> Download page but to not use them regularly on instructions steps. They
> take up quite a bit of vertical space and require headings. Having more
> compact instructions is also a way of making them clearer.

> But now that you forced me to have a second thought about it, I realized
> that having numbers for the h2 headings, which correspond to a sequence
> here as well (on the contrary to h1 headings), might be a good thing.
> Then we could speak of step 1.3 for example.

> So what do you think of b4b048e?

Cannot find it.

>> To end with, the instructions to install seahorse-nautilus on Debian
>> (doc/get/verify_the_iso_image_using_gnome) are wrong: unless specified
>> explicitly, apt-get won't automatically fetch the package
>> from backports.

> I don't feel like giving the full instructions on using backports in
> that page. So I did commit a689e82 to point to them. If that doesn't
> satisfy you, please be more explicit on how this should be documented.

Good.

> Ready for merge again, assigning back the review to you.

Merged what I could see, reassigned back to you.

Cheers,
--
intrigeri