[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] revisiting bugfix/7345-upg…

Nachricht löschen

Nachricht beantworten
Autor: anonym
Datum:  
To: The Tails public development discussion list
Alte Treads: Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] bugfix/7443-persistent-files-permission
Betreff: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] revisiting bugfix/7345-upgrade-from-iso-from-1.0-to-1.1 [Was: [review'n'merge:1.1] bugfix/7443-persistent-files-permission]
01/07/14 19:14, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (01 Jul 2014 16:38:12 GMT) :
>> Next (and I think this is unrealted to this branch) in "Scenario:
>> Upgrading an old Tails USB installation from an ISO image, running on
>> the old version" I get:
>
>>     Then Tails is installed on USB drive "to_upgrade"
>>                           # features/step_definitions/usb.rb:163
>>       USB drive 'to_upgrade' has differences in /live:
>>       Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/filesystem.packages and
>> /mnt/new/live/filesystem.packages differ
>>       Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/filesystem.squashfs and
>> /mnt/new/live/filesystem.squashfs differ
>>       Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/initrd.img and
>> /mnt/new/live/initrd.img differ
>>       Files /lib/live/mount/medium/live/initrd2.img and
>> /mnt/new/live/initrd2.img differ

>
>> I'll get back to this.
>
> I'm curious.


Indeed, it's unrelated to bugfix/7443-persistent-files-permission, but
was introduced in bugfix/7345-upgrade-from-iso-from-1.0-to-1.1.

The problem with "Tails is installed on USB drive X" is that it checks
that the *running* Tails is installed on the target device, which
obviously fails when doing an upgrade from ISO running an old Tails.
That it worked for the same scenario running the current Tails is just
incidental.

I've pushed a fix in commit f713311 to
bugfix/7345-upgrade-from-iso-from-1.0-to-1.1 and verified that it works.
Please review'n'merge into testing and devel.

Cheers!