Re: [Tails-l10n] [Review](de) wiki translation for truecrypt

flapflap:
> flapflap:
>> flapflap:
>>> Frithjof:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:40 PM, intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote:
>>>>> flapflap wrote (09 Apr 2014 22:57:31 GMT) :
>>>>>> May I rebase that branch on top of a more recent (e.g. the current)
>>>>>> master, before reviews?
>>>>>> (or should it remain there, where it is?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Merging the current master into a branch that you want to see reviewed
>>>>> is good, as it allows the reviewer to easily diff current
>>>>> master..$BRANCH, and it moves the responsibility of taking care of any
>>>>> merge conflict (if any) onto the shoulders of the person preparing the
>>>>> branch, instead of the person who will actually merge it (and may not
>>>>> speak the language of the conflicting PO files, so may not be
>>>>> qualified to properly solve conflicts).
>>>>>
>>>>> Rebasing an already published branch is OK *only* if you're 100% sure
>>>>> that nobody has started looking at this branch yet, or based any other
>>>>> work on top of it. It's quite rare that all these conditions are met.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to merge the master flapflap?
>>> I followed the advice and merged the current master (no conflicts).
>>>> If you want to rebase will wait with commiting a review patch.
>>> No, I'll leave it as it is.
>>> For the next time, I won't send so many review requests in parallel,
>>> only one after the other and then those being based on a more recent
>>> master. Lesson learned.
>>>
>>> The branch `truecrypt' now looks like this:
>>> 91a102d Merge branch 'master' into truecrypt
>>> 2938ee5 (de) wiki translation for truecrypt: language improvement
>>> 7f7c2f8 (de) wiki translation for truecrypt: poedit file header update
>>> c91cdf0 (de) wiki translation for truecrypt
>>
>> ping?
>> (@Frithjof: only meant as reminder; if you're busy at the moment just
>> tell us and maybe someone else has time for the review)
>
> ping?
>
> (it can still be merged cleanly into current master)

ping? still not reviewed (started 2014-04-06)
Maybe someone else wants to do the review?

Cheers,
~flapflap