Hi,
anonym wrote (03 Jun 2014 13:27:40 GMT) :
> 29/05/14 19:09, Alan wrote:
>>> #7316: Fix system tray icon size in camouflage mode
> [...]
>> Do we think it is a blocker? If yes, do we accept to build a custom
>> gnome-panel package?
> Let's skip this for now. See the ticket.
If we skip this for 1.1, then this ticket should not be a subtask of
#6342, which itself is a blocker for 1.1. If the plan is to fix it
"soon, but not for 1.1", then I suggest creating a "Windows
8 camouflage, phase 2" parent ticket, with #7316 as a subtask, and
possibly others for things that really should be taken care of, but
can't be done in time for 1.1 due to time constraints.
>>> #7274: Decide if torbrowser camouflage is still needed
>>>
>>> IMHO our decision should be "yes", but only some for the basics.
>>> Low-hanging fruit.
Closed that ticket, filed #7367 ("Update web browser's Windows
camouflage for Windows 8").
>> Then we should define what we want to achieve and what "the basics" are.
> I'd rather avoid more round-trips so just pick the low-hanging fruit.
Full ACK.
>>> #7312: Include window-picker-applet
An ITP bug was filed, and Ulrike is working on this, so some concerns
of mine regarding this package are now void: as far as 1.1 is
concerned, we probably can ship whatever crappy package you want.
>>> #7327: Remove launchers in Windows 8 camouflage?
>>>
>>> And IMHO "yes we should", for the reasons stated on the ticket.
>>>
>> I think the lack of icon at startup is worse than the duplication of in
>> icon added to the worse UX. But that should be discussed.
> Let's discuss! Here's my argument:
> While the Launcher bar is shown by default in Windows 8, it is optional.
> However, the same application always "groups" extra instances into a
> single icon, so the same icon never appears more than once. So, I wonder
> why my proposal makes it worse. I can get why it's worse
> convenience-wise, but stealth (which includes avoiding impossible stuff
> like 2+ of the same icons in the panel) always trumps it in camouflage mode.
I tend to agree from a theoretical PoV, but... what branch should
I build and look at, to get a clearer idea on this topic?
(Ideally, the nightly builds from "experimental" should have the
latest proposed stuff of this work, so that more people can easily
test and provide feedback.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
