Author: Alan Date: To: tails-dev Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Feedback wanted on planned implementation of
Feature #5301 - Clone or Backup Persistent Volume
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 17:23:39 +0200
intrigeri <intrigeri@???> wrote: > >> > I'll admit to never having touched a line of
> >> > gtk2 in my life untill I started in on this, but the only way I
> >> > saw based on the documentation would be to fork the file picker
> >> > dialog box as the amnesia user to prevent them from picking
> >> > something bad.
> >>
> >> Please write GTK3 for tails 1.1 which will be the next major
> >> release, based on debian wheezy.
>
> I appreciate your attention to this kind of things, but I don't think
> we will have all our stuff ported to GTK3 for 1.1 (and I don't see why
> this should suddenly become a blocker for 1.1), so IMO CustaiCo can
> choose themselves between the different described below. We can't
> sensibly require people who want to improve our software to first port
> it to GTK3.
Sure. I didn't get the proposal was to extend tails-persistence-setup,
and was only suggesting new software should be GTK3.
