Re: [Tails-dev] active probing vs. AdvGoalTracking

27/02/14 13:22, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (07 Jan 2014 22:23:05 GMT) :
>> intrigeri wrote (07 Jan 2014 22:18:28 GMT) :
>>>> It should be noted that I haven't yet verified that any of the below
>>>> solutions work. I've built some squeeze debs with the solution below and
>>>> will try it one of these days.
>
>>> Cool. ETA?
>
>> Oops, I realized (too late) that this question of mine was
>> considerably off-topic, since we had previously agreed not to consider
>> this problem as a blocker for the first iteration. Sorry.
>
>> My question rather is: given the patch against Squeeze's and Wheezy's
>> NM is a one-liner, assuming it is trivial to test if it works, do we
>> want it in the first iteration of the MAC spoofing feature (that is,
>> in 0.23), or do we think it makes more sense to spend time documenting
>> the limitation of our solution? Both suit me very well.
>
> I'm not sure if we have decided something on this topic yet.
> anonym?

Well, I'm quite swamped at the moment, so I'd like to leave this until
after the 0.23 release. That is unless someone else commits to it.

Cheers!