intrigeri wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:12:44 GMT) :
> as I said on #6595:
> Tails has been allowing cookies by default for a while (treating it
> all as session ones, though). Also, Torbutton allows to protect
> individual cookies (when it's not broken: #6464), covering some of the
> corner cases.
> So, I wonder why we are still shipping the Cookie Monster extension.
> Does anyone know of valid usecases that it helps supporting? Of any
> real-world usage of this extension? (I don't.)
> If we can't find any, then I propose we drop this extension to make
> our design simpler, closer to the TBB's, and to avoid potential future
> issues when upgrading the browser.
At the public meeting tonight, nobody had any real-word use case for
this extension. Unless someone provides that real soon, I'll prepare
a branch to remove it.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
