Yar!
On 2013-11-13 11:07 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>
> It's awesome, and way better than "good enough", if you are acting
> purely as the upstream author. It's bad practice if you intend to act
> as the lone maintainer of this package in Debian.
Uh... didn't know that was an option...
> An intermediary option would be to go for team-maintenance: I'd very
> much like co-maintaining this package with you in Debian. Initially,
> I could do the parts you're not at ease with yet (e.g. pbuilder), and
> obviously I would upload the packages. On the long-run, it would be
> even better if you did everything yourself, and I was only needed for
> the occasional peer-review. How does it sound?
That sounds absolutely brilliant.
> Once we have made a decision on this topic, it'll be obvious who
> should file the ITP bug :)
>
I suppose I'm filing an ITP soon :)
--
Kevin C. Krinke <kevin@???>
GnuPG - 851662D2 - 0x18C67F61851662D2
http://kevin.c.krinke.ca/851662D2.asc
