[Occupyresearch] Please unsubscribe me

Supprimer ce message

Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Ilona Sturm
Date:  
À: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
Anciens-sujets: Re: [Occupyresearch] Occupyresearch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11
Sujet: [Occupyresearch] Please unsubscribe me







From:

                            William Klein <billymorav@???>;                            


To:

                             <occupyresearch@???>;                                                                                                     


Subject:

                            Re: [Occupyresearch] Occupyresearch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11                            


Sent:

                            Thu, Oct 31, 2013 2:29:05 PM                            






Please unsubscibe me. Your unsubscribe function does not work on this end.On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, <occupyresearch-request@???> wrote:
Send Occupyresearch mailing list submissions to
        occupyresearch@???

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        occupyresearch-request@???

You can reach the person managing the list at
        occupyresearch-owner@???

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Occupyresearch digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Tea Party/Occupy Comparison (jeramy townsley)
   2. social movement scholars and digital media (Mary Joyce)
   3. Re: social movement scholars and digital media (Mary Joyce)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:32:02 -0400
From: "jeramy townsley" <council@???>
To: "'List of the shared space for distributed research
        occupyresearch'" <occupyresearch@???>
Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison
Message-ID: <00d101ced279$ab471040$01d530c0$@jeramyt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I agree with those who point out the radical differences between the TP and
OWS, particularly on the issue of wealthy donors for the TP.  However,
Skocpol's analysis of the TP (The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican
Conservatism, 2012, Oxford) highlights that the base of the TP is
grassroots, and is highly skeptical of the big donor class.  In terms of
skepticism of authority, and some other common social movement dynamics,
there actually are similarities between the groups, although the obvious big
differences cannot be overlooked.  Right now I'm tinkering with 3 research
questions

1)      Are there social/demographic/economic predictors of TP vs. OWS-I can
get this from census/ACS Tiger files that have this data down to census
tract level, and FEC candidate data at the district level.

2)      Was there an electoral or candidate impact of the TP (2009) vs. OWS
(2011) on the subsequent election for the districts with activism-i.e.,
movement in one direction or another, compared with the prior election
results/candidates?

3)      Are there tertiary factors that predict activism more broadly-i.e.,
areas with an overlap of TP and OWS activism, separate from factors that
predict a specific partisan trajectory.



Jeramy Townsley

Sociology/Psychology

IUPUI



From: Occupyresearch [mailto:occupyresearch-bounces@???] On Behalf
Of Joshua Shame
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 6:57 PM
To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison



Great points!

> From: gangolan@??? <mailto:gangolan@???>
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:38:16 -0400
> To: occupyresearch@??? <mailto:occupyresearch@???>
> Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison
>
> The two movements are vastly different, and points of contrast are perhaps
more important than the similarities.
>
> One point of contrast: the diametrically different reaction by police and
federal authorities.
>
> The occupy movement was overwhelmingly non violent, conducting
interventions through traditional forms of non violent civil disobedience
and the peaceful occupation of public places. They were met with tear gas,
beatings, raids and arrest.
>
> The tea party often showed up brazenly to public spaces displaying
firearms - even at events in which the president was set to appear - and
they were given a wide birth by police. They did not face state violence.
>
> Why? In short, the first challenged elite power structures and the other
supported them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kathryn Ranney <kranney@???
<mailto:kranney@???> > wrote:
>
> > I think it would be interesting to compare the two groups. A comparison
between Occupy and one of the reactions to it (could we classify the Tea
Party as a counter-movement to Occupy?) might reveal some data about the
more implicit effects of the Occupy movement.
> >
> > Aloha,
> > Katie
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Occupyresearch mailing list
> > Occupyresearch@??? <mailto:Occupyresearch@???>
> > https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
> _______________________________________________
> Occupyresearch mailing list
> Occupyresearch@??? <mailto:Occupyresearch@???>
> https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch

-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:51:24 -0700
From: Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???>
To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
        <occupyresearch@???>
Subject: [Occupyresearch] social movement scholars and digital media
Message-ID:
        <CAJ2iVmG4k3kDsp7UdxdgVJYFuMVd7HnDSBLUuhW32Y7qunpEnA@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I've written this into a research proposal, but wanted to get some feedback
first:

"In the social movement literature within sociology, digital media is less
negated than omitted"


Agree or disagree?  Seems that the social movement studies that include
reference to digital media are coming out of comm.

Thanks,
Mary

--
Mary C. Joyce
activism analysis for the digital age
university of washington  | dept. of communication
www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:52:10 -0700
From: Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???>
To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
        <occupyresearch@???>
Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] social movement scholars and digital
        media
Message-ID:
        <CAJ2iVmGUSGitNbZGVGt_0t0ygnv-5XmSmfbgFAHJQFZAYoJNMw@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

PS: comm = communication (I'd also include media studies)


On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???> wrote:

> I've written this into a research proposal, but wanted to get some
> feedback first:
>
> "In the social movement literature within sociology, digital media is
> less negated than omitted"
>
>
> Agree or disagree?  Seems that the social movement studies that include
> reference to digital media are coming out of comm.
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
>
> --
> Mary C. Joyce
> activism analysis for the digital age
> university of washington  | dept. of communication
> www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
>



--
Mary C. Joyce
activism analysis for the digital age
university of washington  | dept. of communication
www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Occupyresearch mailing list
Occupyresearch@???
https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch


------------------------------

End of Occupyresearch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11
**********************************************