Please unsubscibe me. Your unsubscribe function does not work on this end.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, <occupyresearch-request@???>wrote:
> Send Occupyresearch mailing list submissions to
> occupyresearch@???
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> occupyresearch-request@???
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> occupyresearch-owner@???
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Occupyresearch digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Tea Party/Occupy Comparison (jeramy townsley)
> 2. social movement scholars and digital media (Mary Joyce)
> 3. Re: social movement scholars and digital media (Mary Joyce)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:32:02 -0400
> From: "jeramy townsley" <council@???>
> To: "'List of the shared space for distributed research
> occupyresearch'" <occupyresearch@???>
> Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison
> Message-ID: <00d101ced279$ab471040$01d530c0$@???>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I agree with those who point out the radical differences between the TP and
> OWS, particularly on the issue of wealthy donors for the TP. However,
> Skocpol's analysis of the TP (The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican
> Conservatism, 2012, Oxford) highlights that the base of the TP is
> grassroots, and is highly skeptical of the big donor class. In terms of
> skepticism of authority, and some other common social movement dynamics,
> there actually are similarities between the groups, although the obvious
> big
> differences cannot be overlooked. Right now I'm tinkering with 3 research
> questions
>
> 1) Are there social/demographic/economic predictors of TP vs. OWS-I
> can
> get this from census/ACS Tiger files that have this data down to census
> tract level, and FEC candidate data at the district level.
>
> 2) Was there an electoral or candidate impact of the TP (2009) vs. OWS
> (2011) on the subsequent election for the districts with activism-i.e.,
> movement in one direction or another, compared with the prior election
> results/candidates?
>
> 3) Are there tertiary factors that predict activism more broadly-i.e.,
> areas with an overlap of TP and OWS activism, separate from factors that
> predict a specific partisan trajectory.
>
>
>
> Jeramy Townsley
>
> Sociology/Psychology
>
> IUPUI
>
>
>
> From: Occupyresearch [mailto:occupyresearch-bounces@autistici.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Joshua Shame
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 6:57 PM
> To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
> Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison
>
>
>
> Great points!
>
> > From: gangolan@??? <mailto:gangolan@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:38:16 -0400
> > To: occupyresearch@??? <mailto:occupyresearch@autistici.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] Tea Party/Occupy Comparison
> >
> > The two movements are vastly different, and points of contrast are
> perhaps
> more important than the similarities.
> >
> > One point of contrast: the diametrically different reaction by police and
> federal authorities.
> >
> > The occupy movement was overwhelmingly non violent, conducting
> interventions through traditional forms of non violent civil disobedience
> and the peaceful occupation of public places. They were met with tear gas,
> beatings, raids and arrest.
> >
> > The tea party often showed up brazenly to public spaces displaying
> firearms - even at events in which the president was set to appear - and
> they were given a wide birth by police. They did not face state violence.
> >
> > Why? In short, the first challenged elite power structures and the other
> supported them.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kathryn Ranney <kranney@???
> <mailto:kranney@hawaii.edu> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think it would be interesting to compare the two groups. A comparison
> between Occupy and one of the reactions to it (could we classify the Tea
> Party as a counter-movement to Occupy?) might reveal some data about the
> more implicit effects of the Occupy movement.
> > >
> > > Aloha,
> > > Katie
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Occupyresearch mailing list
> > > Occupyresearch@??? <mailto:Occupyresearch@autistici.org>
> > > https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
> > _______________________________________________
> > Occupyresearch mailing list
> > Occupyresearch@??? <mailto:Occupyresearch@autistici.org>
> > https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:51:24 -0700
> From: Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???>
> To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
> <occupyresearch@???>
> Subject: [Occupyresearch] social movement scholars and digital media
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAJ2iVmG4k3kDsp7UdxdgVJYFuMVd7HnDSBLUuhW32Y7qunpEnA@???>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I've written this into a research proposal, but wanted to get some feedback
> first:
>
> "In the social movement literature within sociology, digital media is less
> negated than omitted"
>
>
> Agree or disagree? Seems that the social movement studies that include
> reference to digital media are coming out of comm.
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
>
> --
> Mary C. Joyce
> activism analysis for the digital age
> university of washington | dept. of communication
> www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
> -------------- next part --------------
> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:52:10 -0700
> From: Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???>
> To: List of the shared space for distributed research occupyresearch
> <occupyresearch@???>
> Subject: Re: [Occupyresearch] social movement scholars and digital
> media
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAJ2iVmGUSGitNbZGVGt_0t0ygnv-5XmSmfbgFAHJQFZAYoJNMw@???>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> PS: comm = communication (I'd also include media studies)
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Mary Joyce <mjoyce@???> wrote:
>
> > I've written this into a research proposal, but wanted to get some
> > feedback first:
> >
> > "In the social movement literature within sociology, digital media is
> > less negated than omitted"
> >
> >
> > Agree or disagree? Seems that the social movement studies that include
> > reference to digital media are coming out of comm.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mary
> >
> > --
> > Mary C. Joyce
> > activism analysis for the digital age
> > university of washington | dept. of communication
> > www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Mary C. Joyce
> activism analysis for the digital age
> university of washington | dept. of communication
> www.meta-activism.org | @metaactivism | +1.857.928.1297
> -------------- next part --------------
> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Occupyresearch mailing list
> Occupyresearch@???
> https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/occupyresearch
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Occupyresearch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11
> **********************************************
>
