Re: [Tails-dev] starting dev

Supprimer ce message

Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Sina S
Date:  
À: The Tails public development discussion list
Sujet: Re: [Tails-dev] starting dev
Thanks for the detailed response.

I've actually changed my system to Debian Wheezy pretty much the day after
I wrote that email (I'm not one of those constant distro switching guys,
but had just gotten fed up with all the cruft showing up in Ubuntu desktop
distro and UI changes in GNOME3 were driving me crazy).

This weekend I will re-try the vagrant procedure on the new system with the
extra info you guys have generously provided and report my findings back.


On 5 October 2013 00:10, anonym <anonym@???> wrote:

> 22/09/13 15:28, intrigeri wrote:
> >> I've read most of the /contribute pages on the website, checked out
> >> the devel branch and looked at the tickets on the ticketing system
> >
> > This is a pretty good start.
> >
> >> I tried to run rake basebox:create and got this:
> >> $ rake basebox:create
> >> rake aborted!
>
> Note that building the basebox isn't required; `rake build` will
> download a basebox that we've prepared. Do you trust us? :)
>
> Also, it seems our documentation is wrong; the command you should use if
> you really want to do this is `rake basebox:create_basebox`. I've pushed
> a fix to the docs (commit 7aeeaf8, also live on our homepage).
>
> > I suspect you're running a newer version of Vagrant, that our Vagrant
> > build system does not support yet. This is being investigated at
> > https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6221.
>
> Sina reports running Ubuntu 13.10, which ships Vagrant 1.2.2, so `rake
> build` will fail later on, indeed.
>
> Sina, could you try installing Vagrant 1.0.3 from the Ubuntu 13.04 .deb
> [1], or via:
>
>     gem install vagrant --version 1.0.3

>
> That should provide you with a build system until that bug is fixed.
>
> [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/all/vagrant/download
>
> > Not that many of us are
> > using Vagrant, and none of us (AFAIK) is running a Vagrant that's this
> > recent, so your first contribution might be to fix this.
>
> I hope this will change "soon" if we can move from using VirtualBox to
> libvirt/KVM in Vagrant (Issue #6212). Otherwise, what is it that
> prevents you other developers from using it?
>
> In related news, while procrastinating yesterday and today I've done
> some initial investigation of libvirt-vagrant, and I've actually managed
> to build a fully working Tails ISO using vagrant-libvirt! I had to
> resort to a couple of non-automated hacks, though, but I think I can at
> least get building into a clean state (basebox building using veewee +
> libvirt/KVM is another story, but that isn't as important). More to come
> on this soon.
>
> >> I also had trouble running veewee on my Ubuntu 13.10 laptop, as vagrant
> >> requires the gem net-scp to be version 1.0.4 while fog (required by
> veewee)
> >> uses net-scp 1.1.2 and these cause a conflict.
> >
> > Ouch. Welcome to the world of Ruby, and its poor support of backward
> > compatibility. I'm sorry this is happening to you, and I'd like the
> > path to you building Tails to be more joyful.
> >
> > Anyone here wants to investigate and fix the Vagrant build with recent
> > Vagrant and newer distros, without breaking this build method on
> > current Debian stable (and possibly, latest Ubuntu LTS)?
>
> Note that veewee is only necessary for building the Vagrant basebox,
> which, as I explained above, isn't necessary for building Tails using
> Vagrant.
>
> Cheers!
>
> _______________________________________________
> tails-dev mailing list
> tails-dev@???
> https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
>