intrigeri: > hi,
>
> an0n102968@??? wrote (01 Nov 2012 19:13:38 GMT) :
>> I am thrilled to see that the Tor Browser patches have finally
>> reached Tails.
>
> Great!
>
> Thanks for reporting back. I've got quite a few remarks (see bellow)
> about how the report back could be better done next time, and expanded
> upon, but this is much appreciated.
>
>> However, I noticed that FoxyProxy was included. According to
>> https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/torbutton-faq.html.en#extensionconflicts >> We are not supposed to use Foxyproxy.
>
> It was the shortest path to support both Tor and I2P in the same web
> browser. I believe the way Tails uses it is safe.
>
> I don't see anything that affects Tails on this FAQ, but I'd be glad
> to stand corrected.
>
>> Also, Adblock Plus,
>
> Please let me refer you to the first question and answer on our
> FAQ for new contributors: https://tails.boum.org/contribute/faq/ >
> Then: https://tails.boum.org/todo/remove_adblock__63__/ >
>> Do not track, and the "Tell Websites I do not want to be tracked"
>> check mark in Firefoxes settings also can cause concern.
>
> Why?
>
>> I have included screenshots in this link <
>> http://www.datafilehost.com/download-0e1b06e1.html > for areas that
>> might cause further issues.
>
> I've taken a look. FYI it was a pain for me to download from this
> filesharing website. Some of the attached files could have been
> replaced, by a link to ip-check.info. Would have saved me and you some
> time and bandwidth. Please consider doing this next time :)
>
> A few of these screenshots don't tell me anything clear about what the
> problem you've seen is supposed to be. Please expand on these, and on
> the others (that is, raw screenshots of ip-check.info pages with a few
> red flags that I doubt are regressions).
>
> One set of test that would be totally awesome to run would be to
> compare your last results (0.14~rc2) with what you get with Tails 0.13
> (that had not the torbrowser patches yet). If you can do this, this
> would be great, and then please report back with plaintext email only
> (copy-pasting parts of the webpages if needed), that is muuuch easier
> to deal with.
>
> Cheers!
