[movimenti.bicocca] Fwd: [Comurb_r21] Occupy Wall Street

このメッセージを削除

このメッセージに返信
著者: Tommaso Vitale
日付:  
To: ML movimenti Bicocca
新しいトピック: [movimenti.bicocca] pubblicità...
題目: [movimenti.bicocca] Fwd: [Comurb_r21] Occupy Wall Street


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Peter Marcuse <pm35@???>
> Subject: Re: [Comurb_r21] Occupy Wall Street
> Date: 17 agosto 2012 00:07:02 GMT+02:00
> To: "'comurb_r21'" <Comurb_r21@???>
>
> A new piece on the Occupy Wall Street and right to the city movements that may be of interest:
>
> “We Are the 99%” - The Slogan and the Reality¬¬
>
> A new blog #17, dealing with the Occupy Wall Street movement and the Right to the City Alliances, as representative of the 99%, who is in them and who in the 1%, why historically they have arisen now, how they have changed since their beginnings, and what their future demands and strategic possibilities and dangers might be.
> The essential points are that the theoretical 99% are much less than 50% in practice, that transformative systemic change is not on the agenda today, that that realization has become acknowledged, particularly since the defeat of 1968, that the Occupy and RTTC movements are recognizing that fact and moving to individual transformative changes, with dangers and, given good outreach, real potentials for new transformative strategies.
>
> Blog #17, at pmarcuse.wordpress.com, is structured as follows:
>
> I.             “We Are the 99%” - The Slogan and the Reality    (also blog 12)   
> A.            Structure of the Argument.        
> B.            Table of Contents           
> C.            The value of the 99%/1% formulation.  

>
> II.  Who are the 99%? The Exploited, the Discontented, the Oppressed. (also blog 13)          
> A.            The directly exploited, (labor +).              
> B.            The discontented (Occupy +).   
> C.            The commonality of the 99%

>
> II.  Who is the 1%  (also blog 14)
> A.            How is the 1% defined?               
> B.            The Tea Party and the 1%            

>
> IV. The Right to the City and Occupy: History and Evolution. (also blog 15)
> A.            History: Rise, Defeat, and New Life of the Resistance Movements
> B.            The Death and Life of the Right to the City Movement
> 1.            Right to the City One: The ideological concept.
> 2.            Right to the City Two: the liberal version              
> 3.            Right to the City Three: Alliance on Individual Issues.
> 4.            The Future: The Dangers Ahead

>
> V.  The Four Faces of the Occupy Movement
> 1.            Occupy One: Class Targeted Discourse.
> 2.            Occupy Two: Physically Taking Over Spaces.
> 3.            Occupy Three: An Umbrella Function.
> 4.            Occupy Four: Occupy as Process.
> 5.            The future: The Dangers Ahead

>
> VI.  The Future: Strategic Implications (also blog 16)
> A.            Transformation
> B.            Concrete Individual Demands, but Aimed at the Whole.
> C.            Unity: The Right to Occupy the City.
> D.            Transformative education, ideology: culture.
> E.            Ideology and Values
> F.            Patience for the Long Haul
> G.           Transformative Strategies

>
> THE ENTIRE ARGUMENT IS TOGETHER IN BLOG #17, WHICH CONTAINS THE FIVE SMMALER BLOGS (but is therefore substantially longer – 48 pages).
>
> They are all at pmarcuse.wordpress.com
>
> Comments very welcome.
>
> Peter Marcuse
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Peter Marcuse                    
> Professor Emeritus of Urban Planning                                  
> School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation          
> Columbia University
> New York, N.Y. 10027
> 212 – 854 3322 

>
> Home: 140 Greenwood Avenue
> Waterbury, CT 06704
> 203 753 1140
> _______________________________________________
> Comurb_r21 mailing list
> Comurb_r21@???
> https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/comurb_r21